pyat: (Default)
[personal profile] pyat
I hate the new Star Trek movie already!

But I'm willing to believe I could be wrong.

And, frankly, I haven't bothered to see a new Trek movie in the theatres since Insurrection, which came out in 1998, and I didn't like it... and I didn't watch Enterprise, and I largely stopped watching Voyager after that awful mystery episode with the dog, which aired in 1995.

So, really, I'm not sure I'm exactly their target market, these days.

Darn kids.

Date: 2008-11-18 02:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leonard-arlotte.livejournal.com
Why do you hate it?

Date: 2008-11-18 02:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com
The opening sequence with 12-year-old Jimmy Kirk doing his Matrix judo flip out the sports car just sort of bothered me so much that everything after that made me wince.

The acting, anyway. The FX look cool!

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] viktor-haag.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:01 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2008-11-18 02:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] slwatson.livejournal.com
I despise it with all of my soul (so far), but then again, I'm really picky about how they write my favorite engineer. And Pegg can't cut it.

...and geez, he gets the most idiotic lines.

Date: 2008-11-18 02:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com
What is it he's actually saying?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] slwatson.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:31 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] madmanofprague.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 03:03 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] viktor-haag.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:02 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2008-11-19 07:52 pm (UTC)
thebitterguy: (Default)
From: [personal profile] thebitterguy
I think he did at least as good as job as the pride of the CBC.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] slwatson.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-19 07:56 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2008-11-18 02:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] heron61.livejournal.com
In vivid contrast, I think it looks very nifty indeed (unsurprising, given how much of a neophile I am). I love the idea of TOS with an updated look and better effects. OTOH, I am less certain about the new actors. I'll need to see more than the trailer to figure that out.

Also, I'm hoping this will lead to another Star Trek RPG that I can help write :)

Date: 2008-11-18 02:13 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madmanofprague.livejournal.com
Weirdly, I'm hoping it doesn't, 'cause I cannot guarantee I'll have the input on it that I have now.

Not like that's a huge issue with RPGs anyway.

Date: 2008-11-18 02:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com
I don't mind the look and the updated effects at all - though I'm curious as to why they're building the Enterprise on the ground. I just get the feel that the acting and script will be... subprime?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] madmanofprague.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:30 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:32 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] madmanofprague.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:38 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] viktor-haag.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:03 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] slwatson.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:32 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] leonard-arlotte.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:35 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:39 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] madmanofprague.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:57 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 03:01 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] madmanofprague.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 03:02 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] hossblacksilver.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 08:30 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] thebitterguy - Date: 2008-11-18 08:01 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] viktor-haag.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:07 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nottheterritory.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:23 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] anidada.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 03:01 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nottheterritory.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 03:50 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] neosis.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 04:02 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] slwatson.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:40 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] madmanofprague.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:50 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] slwatson.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:52 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] madmanofprague.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:56 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] madmanofprague.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:36 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:38 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] madmanofprague.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:39 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] slwatson.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:41 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] slwatson.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 02:43 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2008-11-18 02:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] leonard-arlotte.livejournal.com
Is it just me, or are there a bunch of sci fi geeks complaining about how STAR TREK is doing stuff that doesn't fall within the normal laws of physics?

Dudes! (and dudettes!) It's Star Trek! Shut the brain off and watch the pretty pictures!

Date: 2008-11-18 03:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madmanofprague.livejournal.com
Yeah, it's kind of like objecting to Aesop because it has talking animals.

Date: 2008-11-18 03:09 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com
You sure told us, Leonard! I'll see you at the furry con next week, where we can wrangle with Rafferty over roleplaying game rules, instead. ;)

Date: 2008-11-18 02:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] viktor-haag.livejournal.com
Please. That mode of behaviour is also clearly canonical.

Date: 2008-11-18 03:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] bandersnitch.livejournal.com
"So, really, I'm not sure I'm exactly their target market, these days."

You are EXACTLY their target market. Anyone who is done and tired of Trek is their target market. Also, they want to bring in new watchers who never would before.

I do find that its the most hardcore Trek fans that want to hate this, and I can't seem to find anything wrong with it.

I am excited because it is Trek and its so not all at the same time. And Scotty was more personality than engineer anyways, so Pegg nails it for me.

Time will tell.

Date: 2008-11-18 08:07 pm (UTC)
thebitterguy: (Default)
From: [personal profile] thebitterguy
I don't think they care about burnt out Trek fandom. They care about the actual people out there who will go to the movie once, maybe twice, and maybe buy the DVD when it comes out.

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2008-11-18 08:19 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 08:23 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] bandersnitch.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 08:20 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 08:26 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] bandersnitch.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 08:45 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 08:51 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [personal profile] thebitterguy - Date: 2008-11-19 07:52 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2008-11-18 03:47 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] zenten.livejournal.com
It's weird. I'm having basically no opinion on this. I'm all about half formed opinions and spouting off on them, but I just can't make myself care either way on this one.

Date: 2008-11-18 04:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] momentrabbit.livejournal.com
I'm only going for the eye candy. The delicious, sparkling, gigaflops of eye candy. I may watch it twice! Once for each eye! n.n

Date: 2008-11-18 08:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com
You binocular types make me sick! Parading around with your two eyes. Bah!

Date: 2008-11-18 05:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sixteenbynine.livejournal.com
The CGI gloss is OK, but I fear for what the storyline will yield. If there's time travel YET AGAIN, I'm turning in my phaser rifle.

Date: 2008-11-18 07:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madmanofprague.livejournal.com
Tons of time travel. Sorry.

Oh, uh... spoilers alert.

Date: 2008-11-18 08:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com
Yeah, I don't mind the CGI at all. But the opening car chase and Matrix-flip and so on just... ug...

Date: 2008-11-18 08:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] neutopian.livejournal.com
It reminds me of..something..hmmmm.. (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0120738/)

Date: 2008-11-18 08:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com
No... no... stay back! Not even I want to consider the worst case (worst cast?) scenario..

Date: 2008-11-18 01:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redeem147.livejournal.com
I see that movie as an annoying trend to take the shows I love and recast them, turning into inferior product. I see no need when the originals are available on DVD.

Trek hasn't been good since DS9 anyway.

Date: 2008-11-18 01:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j-cat.livejournal.com
I have to say I'm pretty optimistic. It looks fun. Very silly in places, but fun.

Was TOS not VERY silly sometimes?

(And since it seems to be the debate of the day: Building a giant, unbalanced star-ship on the ground strikes me as silly.)

Date: 2008-11-18 01:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] j-cat.livejournal.com
Additional: I hear that Karl urban nails McCoy and that Spock is pretty good too.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com - Date: 2008-11-18 08:30 pm (UTC) - Expand

Profile

pyat: (Default)
pyat

January 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627 28293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 1st, 2026 02:07 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios