Hooray for New Media? Or something...
Nov. 13th, 2008 01:18 pmLink from
snobahr!
So, it seems the information that Palin didn't know Africa was a continent, despite being widely reportedand repeated by McCain campaign folks, was actually a joke from a fake blog.
So... way to go, McCain and Palin campaign? I have no idea how to process this information.
Edit: I suspect my memory of hearing campaign staff talking about the Africa thing is based on my memories of the FOX news report, which was false.
So, it seems the information that Palin didn't know Africa was a continent, despite being widely reported
So... way to go, McCain and Palin campaign? I have no idea how to process this information.
Edit: I suspect my memory of hearing campaign staff talking about the Africa thing is based on my memories of the FOX news report, which was false.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-13 06:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-13 06:37 pm (UTC)That the Africa thing could go on for so long and be so supported by those 'in the know' really makes you question the integrity of all forms of reporting simultaneously. ^.^;;
no subject
Date: 2008-11-13 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-13 06:50 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-13 09:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-13 09:18 pm (UTC)Googling a bit, it seems that some of them had been directly saying or leaking some negative information to the media, but this was about things like her general preparation and readiness, etc..
Indeed, I don't know that anyone in the campaign repeated the bit about Africa! In fact, I suspect my memory of this is based on reports based on the FOX news report from their political correspondent guy.
*edits post to reflect*
no subject
Date: 2008-11-13 09:26 pm (UTC)Hmmm...
What's even more confusing is that a Palin aide claimed that she had been misquoted on the Africa thing, and reported the specific situation that caused the misunderstanding. Or, at least, that's what she told ABC News.
http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/Politics/Story?id=6196407&page=1
no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 12:29 am (UTC)The fact that so many people (moi aussi) so readily believed it tells you something...
And condolences for having to watch O'Reilly. ;-)
ETA: Having read further comments here and looking back at the Post story, I realize tht it does indeed say that Eisenstadt merely claimed to be the leaker. No one seems to have confirmed or denied the original story.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-13 07:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-13 08:29 pm (UTC)Hold the presses, professor.
Date: 2008-11-13 11:42 pm (UTC)"The pranksters behind Eisenstadt acknowledge that he was not, through them, the anonymous source of the Palin leak. He just claimed falsely that he was the leaker--and they say they have no reason to cast doubt on the original story. For its part, Fox News Channel continues to stand behind its story."
Eisenstadt didn't make the information up, merely claimed to have leaked it. The advisors anonymously quoted were the actual source of the leak, not the fictitious Dr. Eisenstadt. As much as I'd like to bag on Fox for sourcing so thinly, it would appear the Africa story still has yet to be disproven.
Re: Hold the presses, professor.
Date: 2008-11-14 01:48 am (UTC)Re: Hold the presses, professor.
Date: 2008-11-14 02:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 02:23 am (UTC)But I can't help but detect a strong dose of smug urban liberal bullshit, along with a side of chauvinism against a female candidate, in the absolute glee with which Palin is now being portrayed as a jibbering retard from a National Lampoon movie. (One of the right to DVD ones.)
no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 02:26 am (UTC)Yes, I get ya. It's been ugly.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 02:53 am (UTC)The bigger problem, I think, is that her campaign staff was made up of ex-Romney people, and in the aftermath they saw coming, they didn't want her challenging dear Mitt for supremacy. Best to get the discrediting in early, yeah?
no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 08:15 pm (UTC)And I say that as a Mormon.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-15 01:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 03:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-11-14 08:14 pm (UTC)But the glee with which its been passed around liberal blogs, LJs, and forums and the savage, near fetishistic glee with which its been pounded and pounded by left leaning pundits and comedians (like my own beloved Daily Show) is what I was talking about.
One side on the right is trying to bury the other, and the left is only too happy to howl and fling poo to the spectacle.
no subject
Date: 2008-11-15 01:29 am (UTC)Beside that, though, y'know, we are allowed to be amused, here. Watching everyone on the right at once (including the governor herself) pick up a nerf mallet and pretend to be Very Very Serious while whacking Ms. Palin over the head is amusing. If something like that happens to someone who's not by their actions damaging the credibility of your ideals, and you cannot chuckle, something is wrong with you, but chuckling can't and shouldn't be considered picking up a mallet yourself.
Does it help with rebuilding a functioning right so we can have a healthy, meaningful national discourse again? No, it doesn't. But that's why we don't put all our time into this, merely glance over and giggle, then go back to work.