pyat: (Default)
[personal profile] pyat
There's a movement in the U.S. to permit students to carry concealed weapons on college campuses, in order to defend themselves against school shooters. One problem with this idea was raised by the police chief at the University of Cincinnati:

"I shoot everybody with a gun, who doesn't have a uniform on."
Page 1 of 2 << [1] [2] >>

Date: 2008-04-15 03:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] catarzyna.livejournal.com
Do you have an article on this?

Date: 2008-04-15 03:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com
Yup!
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/04/14/campus.guns/index.html

Date: 2008-04-15 03:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dagoski.livejournal.com
So, basically, they're talking about legitimizing gang violence? Great. An armed society not necessarily a polite one; it's a nervous, twitchy, paranoid one. Besides, having a gun doesn't mean you're going to be able to employ it effectively in a panicked crowd. That takes a lot of training.

There is a concern on my part, though. The security situation in Philly is getting bad enough that I am thinking about a conceal carry permit. This is street crime, not anything to with a crazed shooter. Only problem is that concealing and carrying to me workplace is grounds for automatic dismissal and a criminal trespass complaint. That's not entirely fair. I'm thinking that there has to be a middle ground. That's probably one where conceal carry permits are neither just rubber stamped or entirely unobtainable, but are rather a certification process that involves rigorous training. Of course, the best solution to the local street crime is more jobs that don't require graduate degrees around here. That's what's really happening. In addition to all the firearms violence this past couple of years, young people are really starting to lose it over the no future thing. So they're just kind of ambushing people on subway platforms and beating them senseless. To lesser degree these kind of beatings have been happening on the campuses in University City. So, I'd rather have better police coverage, a more just economy and a city, state and federal government that gives just half a shit about what's going on. Guns are really damned poor alternative.

Date: 2008-04-15 03:14 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] momentrabbit.livejournal.com
That's just an underhanded way of restoring school uniforms, then, isn't it...

Date: 2008-04-15 03:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com
"We have a Dress Code for a reason, Beuhler... *BLAM!*"

Date: 2008-04-15 03:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mairesue.livejournal.com
Yes, that must be it because who would let college students carry concealed weapons?

Date: 2008-04-15 03:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madmanofprague.livejournal.com
"These school uniforms look a lot like army fatigues."
"Shut up, student. You should be studying for the quiz on the Handy Iraqi Phrasebook.

Date: 2008-04-15 03:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mrs-dm.livejournal.com
I hear your dilemma, but even considering a concealed handgun is a very strange and disturbing concept to me and most Canadians, I think. I guess it's one of those cultural things that are really different between Americans and Canadians -- something to do with the fact that a U.S. catchphrase is, "Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness", whereas in Canada, it has always been, "Peace, Order and Good Government".

Nevertheless, I have to ask myself, if I were a male, living in a really dodgey area of Toronto, the kind where there is a fatal shooting about every month or so, would I feel the same way? Or would I want some means of protecting myself? I think I would have to still say no.

The reason is, I think a concealed gun would provide only a false sense of security. I think it's much more likely (and statistics show) that gun would be stolen and/or used in a suicide or violent crime. The completed suicide rate in the U.S. is much higher than in Canada, simply because there are more guns readily available. In other words, the shadow side of a gun culture seems infinitely worse than the positive aspects.

Michael Moore's movie "Bowling for Columbine" may be seen as a Liberal polemic in large parts of the U.S., but most Canadians thought it was pretty accurate.

P.S. I saw a CNN news item that, indeed, violent crime has been increasing in large cities in the U.S. for the first time in 15 or 20 years, probably due to the diversion of federal funds from local and state policing to fund the war on terrorism and the war in Iraq. Reminds me of the fall of Roman Empire.

Date: 2008-04-15 03:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madmanofprague.livejournal.com
See, most Canadians would not associate Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness with a culture where everyone is packing. Life implies, you know, not killing people. Liberty implies lack of coercion. Pursuit of happiness implies not pursuing fear and threats of physical force.

Date: 2008-04-15 04:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undeadmuse.livejournal.com
This is why I'm moving to Canada.

Date: 2008-04-15 04:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kisekileia.livejournal.com
That increase in violent crime could be related to veterans with PTSD, too.

Date: 2008-04-15 05:04 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] paka.livejournal.com
Gun control is one of those irrational American issues. We scream very loudly about anything that looks remotely like gun control - for instance, the idea that concealing your firearm makes you look like a criminal. It's very easy to go from there right into ranting about police states, the Odessa octopus, and concentration camps.

It must seem so alien as to be ludicrous to Canucks (not to mention Brits, Kiwis, Danes, Germans, and other people living in First World countries).

Date: 2008-04-15 05:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dagoski.livejournal.com
Yeah, this is pretty much my own thinking. When you clear the holster, you've passed the point of bluffing. If the aggressor backs down, well and fine, but you never know. And, if you react to a perceived threat, what happens if you find out after the fact that there was no threat? Bad karma, big time. Like I said in another of Pyat's posts, if you're having this debate, you really have more serious problems going on. I think Obama was spot on about small town working class Americans clinging to guns and religion. These are both key cultural underpinnings of the rural US. And neither is harmful as such. Religion can turn corrupt and the gun trade is out of control. Guns are symbol of independence and a physical piece of heritage for many. The latter is why I almost bought an M1 Garand rifle many years ago. However, the illegal trade in the cities is very destructive in that the guns escalate feuds very quickly. I guess it's the old double standard. I trust people like me to have guns, but those freaks over there not so much.

The one thing that makes me serious consider getting a gun other than a target shooter, is the US Christian Right. They're been escalating both rhetoric and actions against librarians. Plus, if you teach Evolution in public school or even college, you're a target in some places. This makes both my wife and I feel like we have targets on our backs.

Date: 2008-04-15 05:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] momentrabbit.livejournal.com
More locally, the CBC is agog - agog, I say - that there are no restrictions on purchasing 'bullet ingredients'. Black powder! Primers! Casings! Metal shot! Why, any 4-year-old could be Rambo in a matter of minutes!!

I can't wait for them to discover the 'zip gun'. And we all know where that leads...

They'll get my lathe when they pry it from my cold, dead hands. When machining is outlawed, only outlaws will be machinists! Better judged by 12 than carried by 6!

((.. come to think of it, at leaat one of my 'home machinist' texts has plans for a very, very small but workable cannon... hmm.))

Date: 2008-04-15 05:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dagoski.livejournal.com
Yeah, I remember LA in the 1980s. My own patch wasn't too bad, just a little ways up the boulevard, things were really tense because everyone was indeed packing. Someone opened up on a house party was I at once and the panic was such that the only thing anyone could do was hit the ground. Idiot's aim was so bad that he put a bunch of holes in the roof so no one got hurt.

As I've said, if firearms start looking like necessity, you're society's got real problems and they're not the kind that can be solved by asserting 2nd Ammendment rights or one's particular interpretation of it.

Date: 2008-04-15 05:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] momentrabbit.livejournal.com
(((Note to self: check and see if there /are/ laws regarding the transport of cannons. What about a 'sawed-off cannon'?))

Date: 2008-04-15 05:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] momentrabbit.livejournal.com
(((((Sorry, not feeling very well and rambling a bit today. Ugh.)))))

Date: 2008-04-15 05:33 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] momentrabbit.livejournal.com
It's the Society for Campus Aesthetics! First they ask you to hide your weapons, then they tell you to wear uniforms for your own good, and next they're repainting the pavement to match the daisies! Those well-coordinated bastards...

Date: 2008-04-15 05:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com
I recall a webpage that had details on how to build an SMG with a couple of pipes, some springs, and a compressed air cannister. You could be equipping armies, man!

Date: 2008-04-15 05:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com
Ramble on, sir, to find the Queen of all your Dreams!

Date: 2008-04-15 05:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com
It must seem so alien as to be ludicrous to Canucks (not to mention Brits, Kiwis, Danes, Germans, and other people living in First World countries).

It sort of does. The Right to Bear Arms is more or less equivalent, in my mind, with the Right to Own a Submarine. :)

Date: 2008-04-15 06:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] koogrr.livejournal.com
I think there's a WW2 "grease gun" machinegun that is easily turned out on a lathe. Also, I think a lot of the prohibition mobsters or perhaps modern ones make their own. The parts aren't that complex, they just have to fit together, so it'd be pretty easy to hand-tool them to make them work.

As for gun-control/gun-rights, there's blogs and lj communities with much more motivated people willing to correct facts and mis-conceptions. I really can't be bothered talking about it anymore. I used to be against, now am for, and continue to re-assess my opinion but trying to discuss it with anyone who wasn't doing the research officially became a waste of my time late 2003.

Date: 2008-04-15 06:13 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madmanofprague.livejournal.com
There's a difference?

Date: 2008-04-15 06:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] foomf.livejournal.com
Not really. Increase in poverty, more like.
Or perceived oppression.

Date: 2008-04-15 06:18 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madmanofprague.livejournal.com
Isn't this why we have sociologists?
Page 1 of 2 << [1] [2] >>

Profile

pyat: (Default)
pyat

January 2020

S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627 28293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 24th, 2026 08:59 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios