Dirty Old Town
Jan. 31st, 2007 10:33 amMy hometown, Hamilton, is the 8th largest city in Canada, with a 2001 population of 490,284. Last night, there was a hostage taking, murder, and subsequent suicide just a dozen or so houses down the street from me.
Hamilton has a reputation as a dangerous, grimy place. While I won't argue the grime, I question the crime. And that was a rhyme.
So, let's crunch the numbers! These are the 2004 crime stats for all cities in Canada larger than 100,000. Numbers are "per 100,000 residents".
What's this, dear readers? Do I see Hamilton boasting a substantially lower crime rate than almost all other cities of a similar size in Canada? And marking the largest decrease in total criminal offenses? Do I see Toronto with higher homicide and robbery rates? In fact, the homicide rate in Hamilton is lower than that of Honolulu
Hamilton, it seems, compares very favourably with all other major cities in Canada, some of which have property values considerably higher than that of my gloomy industrial city. What the heck is going on in Saskatchewan, though? Farmer uprising?
For the sake of interest, let's look at the 2005 city homicide rates down in the U.S.A.
Compton, Calif. 67.1
Gary, Ind. 58.0
Birmingham, Ala. 44.3
Youngstown, Ohio 43.7
Baltimore, Md. 42.0
Camden, N.J. 41.2
Flint, Mich. 40.1
Detroit, Mich. 39.3
Richmond, Calif. 38.8
St. Louis, Mo. 37.9
Trenton, N.J. 36.2
Washington, DC 35.4
Kind of depressing, really, but then that's the 12 worst. I think Compton technically counts as a revolution in progress, doesn't it? Anyway, let's skip way down the list, to #75.
Minneapolis, MN 12.5
Peoria, Ill. 12.4
Pueblo, Colo. 12.4
Rockford, Ill. 12.4
Lancaster, Calif. 12.3
North Las Vegas, Nev. 12.2
Yakima, Wash. 12.2
Bellflower, Calif. 11.9
Springfield, Mass. 11.9
St. Petersburg, Fla. 11.8
Columbus, Ga. 11.7
...and so on to #100.
Newport News, Va. 10.8
The U.S. national rate in 2005 was 5.6 murders per 100,000 people. Canada was 1.9 in 2004. Hamilton was 1.3.
While gathering these stats, I was interested to discover that, while the UK has a very low homicide rate, it's overall violent crime/robbery rates are just about the highest in the first world. From the Telegraph:
According to the comparison of international crime statistics produced by the UN's Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention, England and Wales had 9,766 crimes for every 100,000 people in the year 2000. America had 8,517, South Africa 7,997, Germany 7,621 and Russia 2,022.
New Zealand and FINLAND of all places, are higher.
Rule, Britannia!
Hamilton has a reputation as a dangerous, grimy place. While I won't argue the grime, I question the crime. And that was a rhyme.
So, let's crunch the numbers! These are the 2004 crime stats for all cities in Canada larger than 100,000. Numbers are "per 100,000 residents".
| Crime rates for selected offences by census metropolitan area | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Homicide | Robbery | Break-ins | Motor vehicle theft | Total Criminal Code Offences | ||||||||||
| % change in rate 2003 to 2004* | ||||||||||||||
| CMAs with population of 500,000 and over | ||||||||||||||
| Winnipeg1 | ||||||||||||||
| Vancouver | ||||||||||||||
| Edmonton | ||||||||||||||
| Montréal | ||||||||||||||
| Calgary | ||||||||||||||
| Hamilton | ||||||||||||||
| Ottawa2 | ||||||||||||||
| Quebec | ||||||||||||||
| Toronto | ||||||||||||||
| CMAs with population between 100,000 and 500,000 | ||||||||||||||
| Regina | ||||||||||||||
| Saskatoon | ||||||||||||||
| Abbotsford | ||||||||||||||
| Victoria | ||||||||||||||
| Halifax | ||||||||||||||
| Thunder Bay | ||||||||||||||
| Windsor | ||||||||||||||
| London | ||||||||||||||
| Saint John | ||||||||||||||
| Kingston | ||||||||||||||
| St. John's | ||||||||||||||
| St. Catharines–Niagara | ||||||||||||||
| Greater Sudbury/Grand Sudbury | ||||||||||||||
| Sherbrooke | ||||||||||||||
| Gatineau3 | ||||||||||||||
| Kitchener | ||||||||||||||
| Trois–Rivières | ||||||||||||||
| Saguenay | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
What's this, dear readers? Do I see Hamilton boasting a substantially lower crime rate than almost all other cities of a similar size in Canada? And marking the largest decrease in total criminal offenses? Do I see Toronto with higher homicide and robbery rates? In fact, the homicide rate in Hamilton is lower than that of Honolulu
Hamilton, it seems, compares very favourably with all other major cities in Canada, some of which have property values considerably higher than that of my gloomy industrial city. What the heck is going on in Saskatchewan, though? Farmer uprising?
For the sake of interest, let's look at the 2005 city homicide rates down in the U.S.A.
Compton, Calif. 67.1
Gary, Ind. 58.0
Birmingham, Ala. 44.3
Youngstown, Ohio 43.7
Baltimore, Md. 42.0
Camden, N.J. 41.2
Flint, Mich. 40.1
Detroit, Mich. 39.3
Richmond, Calif. 38.8
St. Louis, Mo. 37.9
Trenton, N.J. 36.2
Washington, DC 35.4
Kind of depressing, really, but then that's the 12 worst. I think Compton technically counts as a revolution in progress, doesn't it? Anyway, let's skip way down the list, to #75.
Minneapolis, MN 12.5
Peoria, Ill. 12.4
Pueblo, Colo. 12.4
Rockford, Ill. 12.4
Lancaster, Calif. 12.3
North Las Vegas, Nev. 12.2
Yakima, Wash. 12.2
Bellflower, Calif. 11.9
Springfield, Mass. 11.9
St. Petersburg, Fla. 11.8
Columbus, Ga. 11.7
...and so on to #100.
Newport News, Va. 10.8
The U.S. national rate in 2005 was 5.6 murders per 100,000 people. Canada was 1.9 in 2004. Hamilton was 1.3.
While gathering these stats, I was interested to discover that, while the UK has a very low homicide rate, it's overall violent crime/robbery rates are just about the highest in the first world. From the Telegraph:
According to the comparison of international crime statistics produced by the UN's Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention, England and Wales had 9,766 crimes for every 100,000 people in the year 2000. America had 8,517, South Africa 7,997, Germany 7,621 and Russia 2,022.
New Zealand and FINLAND of all places, are higher.
Rule, Britannia!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 05:12 pm (UTC)But they need a full-time coroner.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 04:23 pm (UTC)clearly they haven't fucking taken a look around.
What the heck is going on in Saskatchewan, though? Farmer uprising?
the population of regina is over half native american and over half low income and living on welfare. does that answer your question?
macleans recently named a neighbourhood about a 10 minute walk from my house, and where i spent much of my childhood, as the worst neighbourhood in canada. you should read the article, it's pretty shocking.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 05:12 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 05:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 05:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 05:26 pm (UTC)I also noted the MacLean’s this week had a head line of "We fixed Regina!" I haven't read it yet, but I hope that they're not claiming that they are responsible for any changes that may happen... I'll really get my panties in a knot and I just might have to write a stern letter...
I’m finding them rather annoying these days. Along the same lines as the Toronto Star, some of it is interesting but not always fact…
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 09:59 pm (UTC)In America at least. To be specific, LA.
I think this might be it... :)
Date: 2007-01-31 05:31 pm (UTC)Re: I think this might be it... :)
Date: 2007-01-31 05:37 pm (UTC)Re: I think this might be it... :)
Date: 2007-01-31 07:02 pm (UTC)I had no idea that Canada had it's very own Detroit.
Icky.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 04:36 pm (UTC)What surprise me about the US city list is how many murders Lancaster, CA had. For those who don't know, Lancaster is this little town in the high desert outside of LA. The only thing out there is a USAF base and the Lockheed Skunk Works which was located there primarily because it was in the middle of nowhere.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 05:11 pm (UTC)If it's a small place overall, then even a few murders can send it shooting up in the rankings. A town with a population of 10,000 that had one murder every three months would have annual homicide rate of 40.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 05:19 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 05:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 05:45 pm (UTC)I know Inland Empire sounds like a nation state from Rifts, but that's the name for the area east of the Metro LA.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 05:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 10:07 pm (UTC)The result is that most of "central" Lancaster is pretty safe (though I once did get into a fight with skin heads at Toys R Us that almost landed me in jail), but the outskirts (past, say, 50th east or so along J & K) get increasingly rough, and there is a lot of criminal activity outside the incorporated areas of town.
Hell, once after a break down of my car out in the boonies I got picked up by some Black Peace Stones up from LA. They took me to the local biker bar and gave me a quarter to call a tow-truck. Fun times.
Its also worth noting that Compton is one of those places that both looks, feels, and is dangerous. (Though its really less third-worldy than the media tends to paint it. Much of the time it really is just a neighborhood.) OTOH, I've been in legitimately dangerous areas in other parts of LA, Chicago, and Toronto that were crime centers, but seemed so pleasant that my radar didn't go off at the time. Only after getting home and doing research did I find out that they were major mugging, carjacking, and gang centers.
So maybe that's Hamilton's problem? Not that it really is dangerous, but that it somehow feels or looks hostile to outsiders?
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 01:51 am (UTC)Meanwhile, the rough areas in LA County are strange compared to the same kind of areas back east. So in Compton and similar places you'll see these houses with manicured, but dried out lawns. Not a whole lot of trash laying around either. You think it's okay til you notice the bars on all the windows. But, man, here in Philly there is no mistaking the Bad NeighborhoodTM. I am continuallly astonished at how completely bombed out many, sometimes it seems like most, neighborhoods are out here.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 01:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 05:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 05:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 05:22 pm (UTC)But dude, what's up with Winnipeg?
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 05:25 pm (UTC)Winnipeg is the only large city in Manitoba, and as such it's the natural magnet for unemployed people seeking work, for goverment services, cheap housing, etc. The poverty rate is quite high as a result.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 06:02 pm (UTC)>While gathering these stats, I was interested to discover that, while the UK >has a very low homicide rate, it's overall violent crime/robbery rates are just >about the highest in the first world.
Yep, pretty much. Welcome to the UK, the land of crips, lager and drunken fights every saturday night, ASBOs, crime and chavs. It's even worse when you read/see stories such as the UK's prisons are almost full, and one paper which carried a headline saying "John reid's brain is missing" and carried a phone number to ring if you see his (John reid being the UK home secretary) brain :) !
SP
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 06:05 pm (UTC)SP
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 09:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 06:11 pm (UTC)The most cynical reason for all of this may simply be that NYC is far too expensive to live in for most people, and that if you live there, you're not apt to commit much petty crime to begin with.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 06:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 06:18 pm (UTC)I should say that when I lived in the city, I never felt unsafe. I was unnerved by some individual people who may have been hanging around, but I didn't feel like I was in danger if I stepped outside at 2AM. That and I was able to park my car on the street without incident.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 10:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 10:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 10:21 pm (UTC)However, given the number of criminals with children I've known, I'm not giving the most recent round any more credit than I gave the last one.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 10:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 10:30 pm (UTC)I'm not saying I believe it, but the people behind the theory also took into account several other possible explanations.
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 07:48 pm (UTC)Sorry, just had to throw that out there, it amuses me so greatly!
no subject
Date: 2007-01-31 10:10 pm (UTC)So you're 20 times more likely to get killed in LA, but 9 times more likely to get murdered by machete in Toronto.
no subject
Date: 2007-02-01 05:23 am (UTC)It's actually funny, because I have a few friends (EQ guildies) who live in modern Nottingham.
Hmm
Date: 2007-02-01 02:02 pm (UTC)/nerd who digs the nick