Frame analysis of the firing has also provided me with some rough data on the velocity of the Mousehold I probe.




The camera was filming at 14 frames per second. In between frames 2 and 3, the rocket has cleared the height of the launch tower, about 75 cm.
So, 0.75 m in 1/14 of a second means 10.5 m/s, or 630 metres a minute, or 37,800 metres an hour, or 37.8 kmph (23.4 mph). Or, to put it another way, roughly 0.09% of escape velocity.
I'm going to need about a thousand more engines! Right? It works that way, right? More seriously, I think my digital camera can be set for 30 fps. I'll try that for the next launch.




The camera was filming at 14 frames per second. In between frames 2 and 3, the rocket has cleared the height of the launch tower, about 75 cm.
So, 0.75 m in 1/14 of a second means 10.5 m/s, or 630 metres a minute, or 37,800 metres an hour, or 37.8 kmph (23.4 mph). Or, to put it another way, roughly 0.09% of escape velocity.
I'm going to need about a thousand more engines! Right? It works that way, right? More seriously, I think my digital camera can be set for 30 fps. I'll try that for the next launch.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-01 09:58 pm (UTC)Basically *true* slow motion.
If I get one of those I'll probably go nuts recording all sorts of things and watching them in slow-mo. :)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-02 12:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-03 01:25 am (UTC)At some point it would've reached an equilibrium - there's not THAT much power in those tiny solid-fuel engines - but it'd probably be going at least a bit faster than it was so close to the ground.
Besides - using a single datum as reference? Shame on you. :)
[/GEEK]
no subject
Date: 2009-03-03 01:46 am (UTC)However, we can assume it was travelling about 37 kmph when it left the gantry, I think.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-03 02:11 am (UTC)Rather than treat this as an estimate of speed, treat it as something you know it was exceeding. :)