Pyat and the Hard-Soft-Water-Sale
Jan. 28th, 2009 09:13 pmThe interaction was as follows:
The sales rep ("Kathi") tried to get
velvetpage to sign a purchase agreement tonight, saying that we will forfeit $4000 in special soap that she can give us, but ONLY IF WE BUY NOW.
velvetpage asks to think about it till Friday. Fine, says Kathi, but you won't get the $4000 of soap.
I was putting the girls to bed when this was being said, but came down when I heard Kathi talking about signing. I'd also been in the living room for most of the pitch. I ducked out as soon as I'd seen the product samples, about 2 minutes in. Anyway, I stomped into the conversation like a surly dinosaur and told Kathi we would not be buying tonight.
I should note that my hair was disarranged and standing up, and I was generally wrinkled and untucked from wrangling the girls. Kathi didn't seem impressed by me. I should have been wearing an undershirt, carrying a beer bottle and smoking a stub of a cigar, to complete the picture of clumping male Archie Bunker stereotype.
(I should have growled, "I hear soft water is for homos and commies!")
Kathi objected that I'd not heard her sales pitch, or seen the demonstration. What she didn't know is that I'd been busily googling and doing price research in the living room while listening to her spiel in the kitchen. The bulk of reviews that struck me as detailed and informed were along the lines of "It works fine, but it very overpriced." And, I'd been turned off by her patronizing sales pitch, which was also rather misleading, as we shall see.
I told Kathi that we'd been told she was coming to test our water on behalf of a "community service organization." I told her that
velvetpage had asked the appointment setter, point blank, if they were selling anything, and was told they were not.
Said Kathi, "Oh, I'm not selling anything. I'm here to demonstrate the problem with your water, and show you a solution that we have."
That comment made me very mad, and the following interaction was rather terse.
Sez I: "How much is it?"
Kathi: "$37 a month." (This is an outright lie - it is actually $97 a month. She knocked off $60 a month to represent the "savings" we'd realize from not using as much soap or skin lotion.)
Me: "For how long?"
Kathi: "120 months."
Me: "And we don't get the soap if we don't sign tonight?"
Kathi: *pause* "No."
Me: "Then we aren't getting the soap."
Kathi: "Do you know our warranty?"
Me: "Is it on the Internet?"
Kathi: "It's a lifetime warranty."
Me: (I mumbled something generally non-committal.)
Kathi: "You didn't see the demonstration and..."
Me: "I know we need a water softener, but I don't think we need a Rainsoft one."
Then I stumped along back upstairs, wishing I'd told her to leave as soon as the pitch started.
As she was leaving, Kathi privately told
velvetpage that we could "probably" get the free soap if we referred someone.
The sales rep ("Kathi") tried to get
I was putting the girls to bed when this was being said, but came down when I heard Kathi talking about signing. I'd also been in the living room for most of the pitch. I ducked out as soon as I'd seen the product samples, about 2 minutes in. Anyway, I stomped into the conversation like a surly dinosaur and told Kathi we would not be buying tonight.
I should note that my hair was disarranged and standing up, and I was generally wrinkled and untucked from wrangling the girls. Kathi didn't seem impressed by me. I should have been wearing an undershirt, carrying a beer bottle and smoking a stub of a cigar, to complete the picture of clumping male Archie Bunker stereotype.
(I should have growled, "I hear soft water is for homos and commies!")
Kathi objected that I'd not heard her sales pitch, or seen the demonstration. What she didn't know is that I'd been busily googling and doing price research in the living room while listening to her spiel in the kitchen. The bulk of reviews that struck me as detailed and informed were along the lines of "It works fine, but it very overpriced." And, I'd been turned off by her patronizing sales pitch, which was also rather misleading, as we shall see.
I told Kathi that we'd been told she was coming to test our water on behalf of a "community service organization." I told her that
Said Kathi, "Oh, I'm not selling anything. I'm here to demonstrate the problem with your water, and show you a solution that we have."
That comment made me very mad, and the following interaction was rather terse.
Sez I: "How much is it?"
Kathi: "$37 a month." (This is an outright lie - it is actually $97 a month. She knocked off $60 a month to represent the "savings" we'd realize from not using as much soap or skin lotion.)
Me: "For how long?"
Kathi: "120 months."
Me: "And we don't get the soap if we don't sign tonight?"
Kathi: *pause* "No."
Me: "Then we aren't getting the soap."
Kathi: "Do you know our warranty?"
Me: "Is it on the Internet?"
Kathi: "It's a lifetime warranty."
Me: (I mumbled something generally non-committal.)
Kathi: "You didn't see the demonstration and..."
Me: "I know we need a water softener, but I don't think we need a Rainsoft one."
Then I stumped along back upstairs, wishing I'd told her to leave as soon as the pitch started.
As she was leaving, Kathi privately told
no subject
Date: 2009-01-29 03:02 am (UTC)And there is NO WAY that there's that much savings in soap. My Mom has very hard water here, and spends very little on soap.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-29 03:26 am (UTC)My mom made lye soap. Once :)
(no subject)
From:Did someone say lye? :-)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-29 03:31 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-29 03:34 am (UTC)That woman needed a harder and higher stone wall. Also, $11,640 water softener WTF. That's not a water softener, it's a stupidity tax.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-29 03:45 am (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-29 03:48 am (UTC)Always have the decision makers present. The fact that she was presenting to your wife and not both of you.. I would have predicted the outcome instantly even if she was selling tickets to the second coming.
Your wife was never going to buy with you not present. Kathi would have been wise to have saved her time and insisted you take part in the presentation. Then at very least she would have stood a chance to convince you of her routine.
Granted you can count, so convincing you of what she was presenting seemed relatively unlikely anyways.
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-29 03:57 am (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_confidence_tricks
but when I looked I couldn't find anything.
But then this was much more productive:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&hs=isi&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=scam+products+water+filter&spell=1
It seems that a lot of "water filter" product sales involves a scam or a fraud.
I am SO glad you wasted her time for her.
no subject
Date: 2009-01-29 04:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-01-29 05:02 am (UTC)I remember talking to one of these idiots that left a pill bottle sized sample bottle to "test" your water for various things. I looked it, I looked at them and told them point blank who I worked for and in what department I worked (I signed drinking water reports for water testing facilities). They scuttled off with their tail between their legs.
This is the procedure you must follow in order to take a drinking water sample for testing in Ontario. http://www.ontario.ca/drinkingwater/132586.pdf
It normally involves precleaned 1-2 litre bottles from a certified lab. Anything else is bullshit. You should call her up and charge her for the 2 hours of time you can never get back.
*is in pain and cranky*
(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-29 09:39 am (UTC)Fraud
Date: 2009-01-29 11:11 am (UTC)In the U.S., I'd beg you to contact your state's Attorney General.
In Canada, I don't know where you report frauds like this, but I bet I can find someone who does, if you don't.
AIIIIIEEEE!!!!
Re: Fraud
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-29 12:41 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-29 01:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
From:no subject
Date: 2009-01-29 03:02 pm (UTC)Lee.
(no subject)
From: