pyat: (Default)
pyat ([personal profile] pyat) wrote2008-11-04 12:17 pm

Why Canadians seem to complain about Americans so much...

From a comment in another journal - some thoughts. My comment should in no way be taken to mean that I say, "Heck yeah, this is why we should hate all y'all!" It's a description of status quo, and part of the reason it exist:

While you never hear anyone say bad about Canada, there is certainly a history of general thoughtlessness or outright antipathy towards Canadians on the part the United States as a whole.

Partly, it has been political and military. I'll talk about that a bit first, but I want to assure you it's not as big an issue these days.

In 1895, Theodore Roosevelt wrote "the greatest boon I could confer upon this nation (would be) an immediate war with Great Britain for the conquest of Canada... I will do my very best to bring about the day."

From the American Revolution onward through the 19th century American politicans often spoke explicitly of "liberating" Canada, or annexing all or part of it in the name of Manifest Destiny. The Articles of Confederation from 1777 assumed the Canadian colonies would join.

There were also a number of military incursions (mostly unofficial) into Canada in the 19th century, in the support of local unrest against the British Crown. Often, these were condemned by Washington (such as the cross border raids by Irish American-Fenians) but also sort of tacitly permitted to continue. I beleive there were incursions by Confederate and Union troops alike during the Civil War.

Diplomatic disputes between England and the U.S. after WWI led to the development of "War Plan Red," a detailed plan for the invasion of Canada. While they were not widely known then, they show up in the news now and again up here as a curiousity piece.

Obviously, things changed after WWII, and what Canadians most fear now is a gradual loss of independence or ability to retain our sovereignty, and the perception that the U.S. just doesn't care.

For example, border states will sometimes do things like divert rivers without the approval of the Canadian government. Recent similar incidents include live fire wargame exercises in the Great Lakes - something specifically forbidden by old treaty agreements. Then, there is the U.S. refusal to acknowledge Canadian claims to various parts of the Arctic Circle.

U.S. troops or ships have been known to undertake exercises in the Canadian north without getting permission - even in areas the U.S. acknowldges as Canadian. In fact, I believe the main duty of the Canadian Rangers is to monitor U.S. military incursions.

On the more paranoid side - I'm told the U.S. recognizes fresh water as a "strategic resouce," and under some interpretations of the Carter Doctrine, this would open up the possible of an invasion to seize fresh water. And, in fact, in the late 1990s several national media outlets reported that the CIA had current plans for just such a possibility, though I'm sure those were more mental exercises than anything.

Speaking of the CIA, folks up here still remember MKULTRA.

However, for most Canadians these may be secondary to the sort of unconcious cultural arrogance evidenced by the U.S. You say you never hear anyone say anything bad about Canada, and I'm sure you don't hear anything on a daily basis. However, WE never hear Americans say anything good about Canada that isn't slightly patronizing or ironic - in the mass media, at least. Canada is America's amusing and slightly retarded little brother. Right-wing political pundits say much worse things, but then, they hate everyone.

The U.S. government is sometimes rather unpleasant to the Canadian government. Under Bush, your ambassador has been known to dictate policy to Canada, or openly criticize the Prime Minister's stance on certain policies - angrily so, in some cases. This gets reported. It builds antipathy.

Let's not forget about the time Lyndon Johnson grabbed Lester B. Pearson by the lapels and roared "Stop pissing on my goddamn carpet, Les!" because Pearson called for a negotiated end to the Vienam War. Or, how Nixon called Trudeau an asshole and a commie. To which Trudeau, quite properly, noted that he'd been called worse things by better people.

Back to the cultural point! Let me provide two media examples, to show you what respect and attention it appears Canadians are given by U.S. media outlets. (And yes, these are media outlets, not people, but most Canadians are exposed to American attitudes through the media, remember).

First, "Never Cry Wolf." A world-wide bestselling novel by Farley Mowat, who for a time was sort of looked upon as the Canadian Ernest Hemmingway... except less of a bastard. The book is credited with almost single-handedly changing conservation attitudes towards wolves. It's about Mowat's time as a researcher in the Yukon.

Disney made a movie about it - an excellent movie - in 1983. It won awards. Farley Mowat - and everyone in Canada - was a little peeved to see the movie, and find that Disney had changed the name of the protagonist from the real world "Farley Mowat" to a fictional American character, undertaking work in Alaska.

Why? Who knows.

It didn't help that, two years later, Mowat went on a world book tour... and was barred entry to the United States possibly because of his membership in a "left-wing socialist party", to whit, the New Democratic Party, a respected national federal party. This was perceived, right or wrong, as a deliberate snub against a national hero, and it also led to worldwide media attention - but was almost utterly ignored in the U.S. aside from some fluff pieces in the news.

Second film - the 2000 adventure/war film, "U-571." It's about a brave crew of Americans who capture a U-Boat and seize the Enigma code machine. It's a true story, one of the great adventures of the war, and the capture of the Enigma machine in many ways helped turn the tide of the war.

Except, of course, that the people who did it were British commandos and Canadian sailors, some of whom are still alive, IIRC. And they did it six months before the U.S. entered the war.

Why were they changed to Americans? Was the story better because they didn't have accents? I don't know. There are a multitude of examples, but this comment is already long enough.

Suffice to say that I have NEVER met a Canadian who professed to hate, or even dislike, individual Americans simply for their nationality. We DO have a national grudge - sometimes a silly one - against the US as a whole, but not against its people.

By the way, I'm wondering about the age of the people whose comments you may have read. Remember that a Canadian in his or her 20s was in highschool when Bush was elected...

[identity profile] the-vulture.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 01:02 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, the British have been fired upon, too.

[identity profile] velvetpage.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 01:26 am (UTC)(link)
Again, you're misreading what was written. Neither Piet nor I blames all Americans, or even most Americans, for what we perceive to be emanating from America. We don't tar everyone with the same brush. An innate distrust of how the American government is going to treat Canada when it can get away with it, combined with an innate dislike of being ignored/looked down upon/overrun by the media in the U.S., mean that we bring a certain point of view to the table when discussing our two nations' interactions. It's somewhat prejudicial, yes. But you could say that about any negative reaction to repeated stimuli. "Once bitten, twice shy" is, in essence, a reaction based in prejudice - a prejudice that was formed when first one was bitten. Just because it's prejudice doesn't mean it's wrong or illogical - it just means that someone's had reason to be cautious.

It becomes damaging when one refuses to acknowledge the prejudices (we've acknowledged them) and then refuses to accept individuals as they find them without counting the prejudice against them (we do accept individuals as we find them) and then refuses to revise the prejudice upon examination of further facts. The third - well, that's what the post was about. The result: we're still cautious in how we view America's interactions with Canada on a national and media level, because the evidence gives us reason to be. Individually, there is no prejudice.

[identity profile] girlydoll.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 04:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Not to mention that it was all Canadas fault for those plane unabombers getting into the states...But they like (or at least the american media) to overlook the fact that THEY taught them how to FLY the planes.


I can't say much either way, I love the states for its shopping (when our dollar is stronger) and my relatives, half of which are American. It's spin on Canada hurts a bit, (like the big blackout that was all Canadas fault till it turned out it really wasn't) I think there are bad vibes both ways really. Americans are just as sick of being picked on for everything as well I bet as we are of being overlooked.

[identity profile] girlydoll.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 04:32 pm (UTC)(link)
I have a question about your friend who you told to move to Canada. Would she have faced a harder time trying to move to the states? I think one of the things that came up in the whole 9/11 mess was that it was easier for people to get into Canada, then due to laxer laws about boarder crossing between the states and Canada move in that way.

I am curious because this is not the first time that I have heard that it is "better" to move to Canada than the states, the information though it second hand, and as I have no personal friends or family that is doing it from a country outside of North America I have nothing closer to pull from.

Reasons I have heard to date included that it is easier to do legally, and less culture shock due to our large areas of cultural grouping (hence why I go to certain areas of the city if I want to go shopping in a Chinese mall for example) I also heard it is easier to become a full citizen. So what points do you recommend Canada on over the states?

[identity profile] slwatson.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 05:16 pm (UTC)(link)
Actually, the immigration process to enter Canada is daunting in itself -- it's definitely not all that much easier to get into Canada, which has somewhat stricter policies about employment and what kind of money you're bringing in than the US does. It takes longer to become a permanent resident (green card), and then naturalization in the US, but it still takes years to do the same in Canada. So, I don't think it's because it's so much easier to get into Canada; moving to a new continent is daunting any which way.

But there are several points in Canada's favor when it comes to people being told it's better there. You're right that one is culture shock -- Canada is rather broadly diverse, and from my friends there and some additional reading, Canadian culture is far more accepting to immigrants. The U.S. has fostered something of a rather ugly bias in more recent years towards immigration. That might change (I hope it does; we're still a diverse nation and I'd like us to always be so), but right now it's just easier on a person's heart to go somewhere they're less likely to have people whispering behind their backs about their legality, even when they're employed and contributing.

Taxes aren't much higher in Canada than the US, but the benefits you gain from them are pretty damn good. Nationalized healthcare has its problems, no doubt -- the length of time it takes to schedule an appointment with a specialist, for one -- but for someone who's healthy and fit, and who likely wouldn't need that kind of intensive care, Canada's system allows you to get care without paying an outrageous amount of money. For instance, it's thousands of dollars down here just to set a broken arm and cast it. Slip on some ice, and you're paying for it over a whole year or more if you don't have insurance.

Schooling in Canada is far more affordable -- education down here currently costs an arm and a leg. I'm hoping this changes too, under Obama's leadership, but right now you can get an absolutely stellar education in Canada that you just can't afford in the United States.

One thing against Canada is that the cost of owning property is higher, and sometimes significantly higher, than it is down here. But apartment housing is about the same, so far as I've been able to tell.

Really, the US is a great nation. But the last eight years have taken such a toll on our relations with other nations, and even our relations with each other inside this nation that I just don't wanna recommend someone entering my country until things improve. Especially a friend. And while passport laws and the Bush doctrine of closing this border makes visiting friends much harder, right now, it's just better that new people wanting a chance at acceptance and a real chance go to Canada.

Then again, with Obama's election, I can sincerely and deeply hope that changes. One: Our border becomes friendly again, and two: The U.S. becomes more immigrant friendly.
rowyn: (hmm)

[personal profile] rowyn 2008-11-05 07:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow, those media examples are appalling. O_o Sheesh. Hollywood really sucks at times.

[identity profile] the-vulture.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 08:20 pm (UTC)(link)
Ya, gotta love the "Soviet Canuckistan" comment. 'Course, that was made by Rush Limbaugh, so I guess it would be easy to dismiss... except that it's crept into a lot of usage.

Of course, digs like that happen on both sides of the border, they ruffle a few feathers for a bit, and they get forgotten.

Things like friendly fire incidents are more serious. They hurt, but they're eventually forgiven. Friendly fire, while unfortunate, is considered part of waging war. You try to minimize it, but it will happen. Does it happen more with American forces? Possibly, but that simply reflect that, in most cases, the Americans are the biggest players on the battlefield. 'Course, Canadian troops ARE paid a danger bonus when on training exercises with the Americans... ;)

It's things like the Softwood Lumber Tax that do real, lasting damage. When families and communities suffer economically for long periods of time as a result of protectionist policies, some outright illegal, according to the so-called 'North American Free Trade Agreement' (I'm STILL pissed at Mulroney for signing us on to that!), that you get some serious and lasting bitterness and resentment.

[identity profile] girlydoll.livejournal.com 2008-11-06 12:26 am (UTC)(link)
Thanks! That was fantastically written and I am happy to know you think so highly of the country I love (as long as its NOT Winter)!

[identity profile] slwatson.livejournal.com 2008-11-06 03:09 am (UTC)(link)
You're welcome! And I love both countries pretty dearly. I have never gotten the notion that Canada is anything less than a sibling to the United States. Lord, we share so much space, culture and history it makes no sense to look at each other like aliens.

I don't want anyone to think I don't love the United States. But part of loving my nation is being able to look at it honestly, good and bad, and know it needs some work.

[identity profile] slwatson.livejournal.com 2008-11-06 03:18 am (UTC)(link)
Are you kidding me? Most Americans emphatically don't. In fact, most Americans are so disgusted with politics in general that we wanna fucking CRY. 89% OF THIS COUNTRY thinks that we're far off-track.

Now, we have President-Elect Obama. Who is the polar opposite of Bush and won in a landslide vote (by our definition). I'd say your opinion's pretty... out there.

:-) No offense. Just setting the record straight. You know, with facts and all.

[identity profile] zenten.livejournal.com 2008-11-06 03:20 am (UTC)(link)
He got 52% of the popular vote, and many of the people voting for him do not support many of his policies. That sounds like a lot of people have some rather messed up views to me.

[identity profile] slwatson.livejournal.com 2008-11-06 03:28 am (UTC)(link)
Do you have any idea how much 52% is? Really? Now, go Google: Who was the last president to win by 52% of the popular vote?

But hey, while we're at it, do you agree with every single policy of every one of your friends? It's possible to want a candidate even when you don't agree with him, because he offers something that transcends some disagreements.

loving our American cousins

(Anonymous) 2008-11-16 11:54 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't get it either but it has something to do with teh grass being greener. It is sort of like when the father-of-the-bride brings his new young wife to the wedding. You can bet that no matter how ugly the bride is and how drab her mother is...everyone will be bitch'n about the stepmom, especially if she is gorgeous and if she is polite and sincere - forget it - she's in for a night of burning ears with everyone chatting about how big her butt is and how many pieces of cake she ate and how could she wear strapless sandles with that dress and and and. We all want to be the hot young wife and we hate orselves for it. Same as Canadians with our American cousins.

Kathleen Molloy, author - Dining with Death

Re: loving our American cousins

[identity profile] pyat.livejournal.com 2008-11-17 12:47 am (UTC)(link)
An interesting perspective, O Mysterious Stranger!

Page 4 of 4