pyat: (Default)
pyat ([personal profile] pyat) wrote2008-11-04 12:17 pm

Why Canadians seem to complain about Americans so much...

From a comment in another journal - some thoughts. My comment should in no way be taken to mean that I say, "Heck yeah, this is why we should hate all y'all!" It's a description of status quo, and part of the reason it exist:

While you never hear anyone say bad about Canada, there is certainly a history of general thoughtlessness or outright antipathy towards Canadians on the part the United States as a whole.

Partly, it has been political and military. I'll talk about that a bit first, but I want to assure you it's not as big an issue these days.

In 1895, Theodore Roosevelt wrote "the greatest boon I could confer upon this nation (would be) an immediate war with Great Britain for the conquest of Canada... I will do my very best to bring about the day."

From the American Revolution onward through the 19th century American politicans often spoke explicitly of "liberating" Canada, or annexing all or part of it in the name of Manifest Destiny. The Articles of Confederation from 1777 assumed the Canadian colonies would join.

There were also a number of military incursions (mostly unofficial) into Canada in the 19th century, in the support of local unrest against the British Crown. Often, these were condemned by Washington (such as the cross border raids by Irish American-Fenians) but also sort of tacitly permitted to continue. I beleive there were incursions by Confederate and Union troops alike during the Civil War.

Diplomatic disputes between England and the U.S. after WWI led to the development of "War Plan Red," a detailed plan for the invasion of Canada. While they were not widely known then, they show up in the news now and again up here as a curiousity piece.

Obviously, things changed after WWII, and what Canadians most fear now is a gradual loss of independence or ability to retain our sovereignty, and the perception that the U.S. just doesn't care.

For example, border states will sometimes do things like divert rivers without the approval of the Canadian government. Recent similar incidents include live fire wargame exercises in the Great Lakes - something specifically forbidden by old treaty agreements. Then, there is the U.S. refusal to acknowledge Canadian claims to various parts of the Arctic Circle.

U.S. troops or ships have been known to undertake exercises in the Canadian north without getting permission - even in areas the U.S. acknowldges as Canadian. In fact, I believe the main duty of the Canadian Rangers is to monitor U.S. military incursions.

On the more paranoid side - I'm told the U.S. recognizes fresh water as a "strategic resouce," and under some interpretations of the Carter Doctrine, this would open up the possible of an invasion to seize fresh water. And, in fact, in the late 1990s several national media outlets reported that the CIA had current plans for just such a possibility, though I'm sure those were more mental exercises than anything.

Speaking of the CIA, folks up here still remember MKULTRA.

However, for most Canadians these may be secondary to the sort of unconcious cultural arrogance evidenced by the U.S. You say you never hear anyone say anything bad about Canada, and I'm sure you don't hear anything on a daily basis. However, WE never hear Americans say anything good about Canada that isn't slightly patronizing or ironic - in the mass media, at least. Canada is America's amusing and slightly retarded little brother. Right-wing political pundits say much worse things, but then, they hate everyone.

The U.S. government is sometimes rather unpleasant to the Canadian government. Under Bush, your ambassador has been known to dictate policy to Canada, or openly criticize the Prime Minister's stance on certain policies - angrily so, in some cases. This gets reported. It builds antipathy.

Let's not forget about the time Lyndon Johnson grabbed Lester B. Pearson by the lapels and roared "Stop pissing on my goddamn carpet, Les!" because Pearson called for a negotiated end to the Vienam War. Or, how Nixon called Trudeau an asshole and a commie. To which Trudeau, quite properly, noted that he'd been called worse things by better people.

Back to the cultural point! Let me provide two media examples, to show you what respect and attention it appears Canadians are given by U.S. media outlets. (And yes, these are media outlets, not people, but most Canadians are exposed to American attitudes through the media, remember).

First, "Never Cry Wolf." A world-wide bestselling novel by Farley Mowat, who for a time was sort of looked upon as the Canadian Ernest Hemmingway... except less of a bastard. The book is credited with almost single-handedly changing conservation attitudes towards wolves. It's about Mowat's time as a researcher in the Yukon.

Disney made a movie about it - an excellent movie - in 1983. It won awards. Farley Mowat - and everyone in Canada - was a little peeved to see the movie, and find that Disney had changed the name of the protagonist from the real world "Farley Mowat" to a fictional American character, undertaking work in Alaska.

Why? Who knows.

It didn't help that, two years later, Mowat went on a world book tour... and was barred entry to the United States possibly because of his membership in a "left-wing socialist party", to whit, the New Democratic Party, a respected national federal party. This was perceived, right or wrong, as a deliberate snub against a national hero, and it also led to worldwide media attention - but was almost utterly ignored in the U.S. aside from some fluff pieces in the news.

Second film - the 2000 adventure/war film, "U-571." It's about a brave crew of Americans who capture a U-Boat and seize the Enigma code machine. It's a true story, one of the great adventures of the war, and the capture of the Enigma machine in many ways helped turn the tide of the war.

Except, of course, that the people who did it were British commandos and Canadian sailors, some of whom are still alive, IIRC. And they did it six months before the U.S. entered the war.

Why were they changed to Americans? Was the story better because they didn't have accents? I don't know. There are a multitude of examples, but this comment is already long enough.

Suffice to say that I have NEVER met a Canadian who professed to hate, or even dislike, individual Americans simply for their nationality. We DO have a national grudge - sometimes a silly one - against the US as a whole, but not against its people.

By the way, I'm wondering about the age of the people whose comments you may have read. Remember that a Canadian in his or her 20s was in highschool when Bush was elected...

[identity profile] relee.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 10:02 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, then it's just a matter of terminology. ^.^;;

I've always called that a culture war, because I consider our national identity to be a part of our culture, and we're intentionally promoting initiatives to combat Americanization.

[identity profile] velvetpage.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 10:58 pm (UTC)(link)
We're not talking about their goal in making and spreading their shows - we're talking about the effects of them doing so.

[identity profile] pwned-kisa.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:00 pm (UTC)(link)
For the American body politic? I agree absolutely. Which is a shame, because it really doesn't express America.

[identity profile] velvetpage.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:03 pm (UTC)(link)
And then one of those incidents was reframed on an American military/legal drama (JAG) as having been BRITISH troops fired upon. That one really pissed me off.

[identity profile] pwned-kisa.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:04 pm (UTC)(link)
I live 30 minutes outside of DC. I manage to avoid most politics, and exist pretty much surrounded by the thoughts and stuff that actually interest and don't annoy me.

I talk to people. When people start going into politics/whathaveyou, I simply say, "I'm sorry, but I'm not interested in talking about this subject." Most people respect that. The ones who don't? Aren't worth my time.

I don't watch the news, because if it's important enough for me to need to know about it, then I'll find out about it by talking with people, surfing the net, whatever. And, I'm far less likely to get a slanted opinion that way - or, maybe I get several slanted opinions, and it leads me into knowing more than the news would tell me. And, for the most part, I avoid really depressing news that doesn't actually serve a purpose other than depressing people.

If I know that a certain site is going to annoy me, then I avoid it. **shrugs** It's called being self aware and knowing that some people exist just to bring others down, and also being responsible for the kind of emotions/thought patterns that I allow in.

[identity profile] pwned-kisa.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:08 pm (UTC)(link)
we're talking about the effects of them doing so. Which really isn't "our" problem. If people don't want the effects, turn off the tv. It'll show in their numbers being viewed, and they'll realize that they're losing money and stop purchasing the shows. The reason that they're being showed is that they're enjoyable, and it increases their pocketbook. Stop that part, and it'll stop.

I'm sorry, but this is the kind of thinking that allows idiots to buy scalding hot coffee, spill it on themselves, and then sue companies for selling them hot coffee.

[identity profile] zenten.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:11 pm (UTC)(link)
But that only lets you know about politics, not everything else to do with the US. How easy is it to avoid discussions on books, movies, television, sports, history, or really anything else that the US dominates in Canada?

[identity profile] pwned-kisa.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:16 pm (UTC)(link)
That's the problem with grouping people: you have to allow for everyone, or you're being exclusive and slanting things to show what you want to. When you attempt to allow for everyone, you find that it's impossible because there are individuals in said group.

I could just as easily say that all French/Dutch/German people are rude, inconsiderate bastards, and, while I'd be describing a certain select group, and be accurate, I'd be wrong because, it is my belief, that most people aren't rude, inconsiderate bastards. This goes for any group/country.

I got what [livejournal.com profile] pyat was saying, he was saying that because of certain asshatery from the Powers That Be American, we, as a country are pretty much hated by other countries. That's messed, because, just like every other country, we really have no control over our politicians other than to say "hey, you screwed up, you can't be in control next go-around." And, that's only over our elected people, not over the military folks.

So, because of a small number of people, some of them not even really selected to represent us, we're hated. That sound fair to you?

[identity profile] zenten.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:17 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't understand what that means.

[identity profile] pwned-kisa.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Change the subject, buy other material, or just plain out say "I'm not interested." Your complaint is that American culture is infiltrating yours. Then support yours to a high degree, let those you deal with know that that's what your comfortable doing, and that's the end of it. It's really not that difficult, if that's what you want.

[identity profile] zenten.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:18 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm of the opinion that the majority of Americans *do* support these policies though.

[identity profile] zenten.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)
The problem is there *is* no Canadian culture, outside of "We have British roots, and are not American". There is individual regional cultures though, but those aren't as much under assault by the US culture.

[identity profile] pwned-kisa.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:20 pm (UTC)(link)
I answered this more fully down below, but... basically? The political body of America is completely unconnected with the ideals that I've found are prevalent in most Americans.

Once the politician reaches a certain point, for whatever reason (I'd say that it has something to do with the basic personality makeup of a person who would go after such a position) they become disassociated with "the common man."

In other words, those who are "representing America" really aren't.

[identity profile] velvetpage.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:21 pm (UTC)(link)
You're missing the point. Cultural assimilation happens without either side noticing or pushing the effects in question. At least, they don't notice until their nine-year-old thinks Obama is running for president of Canada. (I doubt there are a lot of nine-year-old Americans whose teachers had to correct the statement, "Stephen Harper will be the next prime minister of America!" but I most certainly had to correct the reverse statement, over and over again.)

It's insidious, and you don't realize how much until you come face-to-face with the fact that you know more about Southern California than you do about any city in Canada.

Watching TV is fun. People like it. They choose TV shows for a lot of reasons. When ten choices are American and the reviews for those are all over the news media and internet, and one is Canadian and no one has heard of it or covered it except the Arts and Entertainment section of the local newspaper, which do you think most people will watch? The only other choice is cutting ourselves off from a culture that makes up a big part of everyday parlance. To some extent, the ability to get along in society depends on having a broad frame of reference, at least some of which comes from pop culture - and Canada's pop culture is dominated by America.

Please note, we're not asking you to change this. We accept it as a fact of life, something that nobody purposely set out to do to us anymore than we set out to do it to ourselves. It's nobody's fault. But when I've been teaching Canadian politics for the whole month of September and have someone tell me on the test, the day after election day here, that they voted for Obama for president in the class election, it gets frustrating.

[identity profile] pwned-kisa.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Then you would be wrong. Asshats might support these policies, but actual thinking, caring people who care about their next paycheck? Like most of the people who make up this country? Don't.

[identity profile] pwned-kisa.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
So, basically, what you're telling me is that you resent American culture filling a gap where there should be a Canadian one.

That's like complaining that instead of a blank wall, someone went and put paint there. You don't like the paint, but you're unable to say just what kind of paint you want.

If you want different paint, go out and get some.

[identity profile] velvetpage.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:25 pm (UTC)(link)
I got what [info]pyat was saying, he was saying that because of certain asshatery from the Powers That Be American, we, as a country are pretty much hated by other countries.

I don't think that's what he's saying at all. Our relationship with the States tends to be very mixed. We have good reasons for having some negative feelings, but at the same time, we generally see America as a pretty good place with pretty good relations with us. We look up to America even while we resent being looked down on in turn. It's not so simple as "we hate you."

[identity profile] pwned-kisa.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:31 pm (UTC)(link)
We look up to America even while we resent being looked down on in turn. But, that's just the thing. We don't look down on you. For the most part, we don't even see you. Just like most of us don't see the state next to us. We care about our home, our block, our cities, and, for the most part, that's about it, until something major happens, and we're made aware that there's something outside of our cities.

For the most part, we don't think about Canada. Which you could take as a compliment of sorts. Means that nothing majorly bad really happens and there's nothing for us to mock. "We're" (and by that I mean the media) is good at the mocking and jump at the chance to do so whenever possible. That we don't mock you guys? Means that there isn't something that we can find to mock.

So, in other words, you guys are doing a good job. You don't come to the attention of a society that's generally self-interested but loves to take time out to ridicule.

[identity profile] zenten.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:32 pm (UTC)(link)
OK.

The reason Canada exists is to prevent military and economic domination from the United States from the countries that formed it. The mandate for preventing cultural domination was later adopted.

That's it. Of course the Federal government does more than that, but those things would be handled by the smaller nations (roughly equivalent to where the provincial lines are right now).

It's actually a lot like the original definition of the US cultural identity, which was "We are not British". After your civil war you changed that to adopt other things though. Unfortunately we have not been so successful, largely due to influence from the US. If Britain was a country with 10 times the population and had a huge border with you then I suspect the US would have never adopted a proper identity either.

[identity profile] velvetpage.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Being ignored is just another way of being looked down on. And Piet gave plenty of examples of times when the looking-down-on has been obvious, even policy.

[identity profile] pwned-kisa.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:39 pm (UTC)(link)
We didn't so much create our own identity as steal everyone else's who came over here. That's what makes us American: we're everything else and unoriginal. That's probably the real reason Canada's having issues with trying to get "their own identity."

It's like W. H. Auden said, "Some writers confuse authenticity, which they ought always to aim at, with originality, which they should never bother about." That's because every story has already been told. Just find a different way to tell it that makes it yours. That's all that culture is, a people finding a way of retelling tales that make them theirs.

[identity profile] pwned-kisa.livejournal.com 2008-11-04 11:41 pm (UTC)(link)
**sighs and shakes her head** I'm not going to even try, anymore.

[identity profile] velvetpage.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 12:14 am (UTC)(link)
There's no point. This isn't a logical position that can be logically argued. It's a cultural perception that is deeply engrained in Canadian society. Any logical reason you give is going to be met with, "I know you're right on some level, but. . ." And frankly, you're not giving logical arguments - you're saying, "Your logical reasons to have a prejudice are prejudicial!" Well, of course they are. That's what makes them prejudices. They have a basis in fact, but they're still prejudices.

[identity profile] pwned-kisa.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 12:34 am (UTC)(link)
That's the thing about prejudice - it isn't logical. It's downright stupid and disgusting. "You" might have reasons to dislike what certain members of American Powers have done, but to then blame the rest of the American country, and hold the rest of America under the same light because of a very small number just isn't right.

I think that that's why this post and these threads have pissed me off so much - because it is basically about prejudice. Something that I don't tolerate. At all. (My own personal prejudice.)

[identity profile] redregon.livejournal.com 2008-11-05 12:52 am (UTC)(link)
very interesting read, certainly.

though, i think amidst all the media and such, canadians tend to be the pinnacle of Ford Prefect's entry in that we're... Mostly harmless.

though, if it ever did get to the point where Canada was ever truly invaded and annexed, i'd certainly work to try and get refugee status in the U.K.. though, to be 100% honest, i have to say that i've been kinda watching the apparent decline of canadian culture (americanization?) to the point where i'm wondering exactly what the 49th parrellel stands for.

in a way, it does feel like we're becoming little america.

(*end drunken rambling*)

Page 3 of 4