Indiana Jones Movie Review
Both of us dislike the female lead intensely. I find her feathery, blow-dried 80s hair more annoying than anything else in the movie, including the comical and/or villainous negative Indian stereotypes.
I'm also irritated by the suspension of disbelief required for a couple of scenes. I can accept magic stones and an evil priest with the power to pluck living hearts from a man's chest... but, man, why would anyone fly a small plane load of chickens from Shanghai to Tibet, with an apparent layover for refueling in Chongking? Why would the Chinese pilots ditch the plane over the Indian Himalayas, instead of, oh, say, China?
Magic is fine. But I always had trouble suspending my common sense!
no subject
http://forum.rpg.net/showthread.php?t=396001
no subject
no subject
no subject
Nothing compared to the '80s hair, certainly ;)
no subject
no subject
That was Mrs. Steven Spielberg before they were married.
Honestly, it is my least favorite of original trilogy but I like it well enough.
no subject
And, really, her hair is fine... it's just totally not 1930s hair!
no subject
Hair aside, I know they did painstaking work with her dress it is all made from beads from that era.
Actually, I like Kate Capshaw best in How to Make an American Quilt but that is probably too much of a female sort of movie for you. ;-)
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I still want to see the new film.
Lee.
no subject
(Exception: In D&D, if I have some magical effect that a player ASSUMES is because of a certain spell, but doesn't conform to that spell's resist DC, duration, area of effect, etc., then I might get a player complaint ... because, obviously, he should have a sporting chance to argue my flimsy magical plot hook out of existence!)
The absolute worst is any time there's a "mystery" going on. Whodunnit ... and how? Storybook mysteries largely work because the writer can steer us along, and make sure everyone is smart or dumb at the right time to make things fit ... but when players have total freedom to poke everywhere, and to ask questions (and demand answers) that might or might not be relevant, there's all sorts of trouble. (And if someone asks a question, there's the danger of there being a "tell" if the GM has to stop and think about an answer, or when he waves it off and says it doesn't matter ... as opposed to at other times when he gives a very specific answer that was obviously prepared ahead of time.)
Dungeons, traps, monsters ... or bloodthirsty pirates going "Yarrrr!" - those are a whole lot easier to handle, and less likely to engage the players' thought processes just enough to question the GM's intelligence.
...
Er, anyway, yeah, I didn't like the "love interest" either. I wanted Marion Ravenwood to be back instead. Bah.
no subject
Waste of great actors.
You call him *Doctor* Jones!
"No time for love, Doctor Jones!"
Doug.
no subject
On the DVD special features, George just shakes his head and says "well, I was getting divorced at the time. It's a bit dark."
Daniel has Adam and his friend Eric there, right now. I want to see it, too! (the new one).
no subject
Urg.
It was lame.